Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Catch-22 - Impeachment vs. Martial Law

Rep. John Olver (D - MA, 1st District) issued a statement back in July 2007 stating that Congress won't impeach Bush/Cheney - because if they do, Bush/Cheney will bomb Iran, declare a national emergency, institute martial law, and suspend the 2008 elections.

This statement gained notice in October when it was brought to a larger stage through Ralph Nader including Rep. Olver's words in a speech that became widely available on YouTube.

The question now becomes: What makes you think they won't do this *without* the threat of impeachment? Why won't they go ahead and do it anyway? What will we do *then*????

This administration has proven time-and-time-again that they will resort to whatever underhanded means they require in order to advance their agenda. Assume the worst, err on the side of caution - a return to normalcy after martial law can *not* be guaranteed, so the risks are too high in doing nothing...

You're either with us or against us... Congress MUST support Rep. Kucinich's bill to impeach, or face prosecution further down the road...



Democrats can be War Criminals, too...

If they do not take action to stop the wars of aggression pursued by the current administration, then they are complicit in the War Crimes perpetrated by the administration.

If they do not take action to impeach the traitorous members of the current administration who have committed numerous 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors,' against their own people and the whole of humanity, then they have abdicated their oaths to uphold the Constitution and have themselves become complicit in Treason.

Let them know that they will be held accountable...